Photonics West: reducing noise in mid-IR imaging by a billion times

Jan. 25, 2012
San Francisco, CA--In session 8240-15 at Photonics West 2012, scientists from the Technical University of Denmark (DTU; Lyngby, Denmark) today presented their new approach to mid-IR imaging.

San Francisco, CA--In session 8240-15 at Photonics West 2012, scientists from the Technical University of Denmark (DTU; Lyngby, Denmark) today presented their new approach to mid-IR imaging, which reduces noise by a factor of a billion when compared to conventional mid-IR imaging methods (such as microbolometers and low-bandgap semiconductors like indium antimonide and mercury cadmium telluride). The DTU device also detects single mid-IR photons, serving as a photon-counting imager.

In short, the device upconverts the incoming IR radiation using a lithium niobate (LiNbO3) nonlinear crystal via three-wave mixing, then images the upconverted light with a conventional silicon camera. A conventional IR camera produces on the order of 108 electrons per second, while a silicon camera produces only on the order of 0.1 electrons per secondthus the factor of 109. Light at wavelengths of 1.9 to 4.5 µm can be upconverted and imaged; the viewing angle of the prototype is 12°.

The incoming mid-IR signal is mixed with laser light, producing the upconversion. The upconversion itself is noise free, because upconverted photons are produced only as a result of incoming mid-IR photons; since LiNbO3 is transparent with an absorbance and emissivity of only 0.005/cm at a 3 µm wavelength, it adds virtually no thermal noise. In fact, the researchers had to heat the LiNbO3 crystal to 160°C to see measurable thermal noise.

The setup easily detects single photons; a blackbody object cooled to -10°C was imaged as its individual mid-IR photons were captured.

Jepp Dam, the presenter and one of the DTU researchers, noted that the conversion hardware is only about $10,000 in cost; combine that with a $1000 silicon camera, and you have a complete low-noise mid-IR imager. (The nonlinear crystal itself needs no optics in front of it.)

(Note: the DTU researchers presented technical details of the nonlinear upconversion techniquewhich is based on the dependence of the phase-matching condition on the angle of propagation of the two interacting fields with the optical axis of the crystalin their immediately prior session 8240-14.)



About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Electroplating 3D Printed Parts

Jan. 24, 2025
In this blog post, you'll learn about plating methods to enhance the engineering performance of resin micro 3D printed parts.

Hexapod 6-DOF Active Optical Alignment Micro-Robots - Enablers for Advanced Camera Manufacturing

Dec. 18, 2024
Optics and camera manufacturing benefits from the flexibility of 6-Axis hexapod active optical alignment robots and advanced motion control software

Laser Assisted Wafer Slicing with 3DOF Motion Stages

Dec. 18, 2024
Granite-based high-performance 3-DOF air bearing nanopositioning stages provide ultra-high accuracy and reliability in semiconductor & laser processing applications.

Steering Light: What is the Difference Between 2-Axis Galvo Scanners and Single Mirror 2-Axis Scanners

Dec. 18, 2024
Advantages and limitations of different 2-axis light steering methods: Piezo steering mirrors, voice-coil mirrors, galvos, gimbal mounts, and kinematic mounts.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!