Tessellation of moth-eye arrays drastically cuts backscattered diffraction

Feb. 8, 2013
Researchers at the University of Southampton in England are drawing from the geometry of natural moth eyes by creating hexagonal nanoscale arrays that have small regular areas with differing angular orientations that spatially distribute the diffraction orders.

Surfaces that mimic the eyes and wings of some moth species with arrays of nanoscale features can be used as optical antireflection (AR) coatings. However, the artificial arrays themselves are usually regular over large regions, leading to backscattered diffraction and iridescence. Researchers at the University of Southampton (Southampton, England) are further drawing from the geometry of natural moth eyes to reduce this diffraction: They are creating hexagonal nanoscale arrays that have small regular areas with differing angular orientations (for example, 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°) that spatially distribute the diffraction orders.

The researchers photolithographically fabricated three types of moth-eye-array geometries in silicon: first, a single-orientation array; second, a tessellated array with four different orientations (24-fold optical symmetry); and third, a tessellated array with nine different orientations (54-fold optical symmetry). The resulting nanoscale pillars (with a period of about 250 nm) were not optimized in shape for AR qualities, but for easy detection and measurement of diffracted orders. A setup with a xenon light source, rotation stages, a fiber collector, and a spectrometer was used to analyze the scatter. Various types of data were taken (for example, scattered light intensity at a wavelength of 418 nm as a function of azimuth angle, as in the figure), showing that the tessellated versions drastically reduced the intensity of individual diffraction orders. Contact Petros Stavroulakis at [email protected].

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Hexapod 6-DOF Active Optical Alignment Micro-Robots - Enablers for Advanced Camera Manufacturing

Dec. 18, 2024
Optics and camera manufacturing benefits from the flexibility of 6-Axis hexapod active optical alignment robots and advanced motion control software

Laser Assisted Wafer Slicing with 3DOF Motion Stages

Dec. 18, 2024
Granite-based high-performance 3-DOF air bearing nanopositioning stages provide ultra-high accuracy and reliability in semiconductor & laser processing applications.

Steering Light: What is the Difference Between 2-Axis Galvo Scanners and Single Mirror 2-Axis Scanners

Dec. 18, 2024
Advantages and limitations of different 2-axis light steering methods: Piezo steering mirrors, voice-coil mirrors, galvos, gimbal mounts, and kinematic mounts.

Free Space Optical Communication

Dec. 18, 2024
Fast Steering Mirrors (FSM) provide fine steering precision to support the Future of Laser Based Communication with LEO Satellites

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!