Cross-correlation method measures subhertz-linewidth laser phase noise

May 10, 2017
A cross-correlation method in which three subhertz-linewidth lasers are compared with each other allows the phase noise of each to be derived.

Ultranarrow-linewidth lasers are used for more than just atomic clocks: certain types of spectroscopy, coherent optical communication, and interferometric sensors benefit as well. In addition to wavelength stability, phase noise (or preferably, lack of it) is important for these lasers. Phase noise is the departure of the laser beam's time-varying electrical field from a pure sine wave. The presence of phase noise limits the resolution of systems these lasers are used in. Phase noise for such ultraprecise lasers is also hard to measure. Now, researchers from CNRS and the CEDRIC Laboratory (both in Paris, France) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST; Boulder, CO) have come up with a cross-correlation method in which three subhertz-linewidth lasers are compared with each other, allowing the phase noise of each to be derived.

The lasers are ultrastable laser diodes emitting at 1542 nm and are each locked to its own ultrastable optical cavity, with frequency differences between the lasers of <600 MHz. The measurement of each laser takes place with the other two lasers acting as references. The researchers measured phase-noise power spectral density over a 0.5 Hz to 0.8 MHz Fourier frequency range. They determined that the noise floor of the cross-correlator itself was very low—far lower than that of any ultranarrow-linewidth laser. The three lasers themselves had integrated phase noise of <2/π down to a Fourier frequency of 0.5 Hz. Reference: X. Xie et al., Opt. Lett. (2017); https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.42.001217.

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Hexapod 6-DOF Active Optical Alignment Micro-Robots - Enablers for Advanced Camera Manufacturing

Dec. 18, 2024
Optics and camera manufacturing benefits from the flexibility of 6-Axis hexapod active optical alignment robots and advanced motion control software

Laser Assisted Wafer Slicing with 3DOF Motion Stages

Dec. 18, 2024
Granite-based high-performance 3-DOF air bearing nanopositioning stages provide ultra-high accuracy and reliability in semiconductor & laser processing applications.

Steering Light: What is the Difference Between 2-Axis Galvo Scanners and Single Mirror 2-Axis Scanners

Dec. 18, 2024
Advantages and limitations of different 2-axis light steering methods: Piezo steering mirrors, voice-coil mirrors, galvos, gimbal mounts, and kinematic mounts.

Free Space Optical Communication

Dec. 18, 2024
Fast Steering Mirrors (FSM) provide fine steering precision to support the Future of Laser Based Communication with LEO Satellites

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!