Inexpensive white-light microscopy technique quantitatively captures both intensity and phase

Dec. 17, 2019
Traditionally either simple and qualitative or expensive and quantitative, phase-contrast microscopy can now be done quantitatively in a simple fashion via a white-light technique.

Many living cells absorb very little visible light, resulting in very low-contrast images when viewed under a microscope. However, such cells still affect the phase of the light passing through them, and as a result phase-contrast microscopy can be used to turn these differences in phase into intensity changes. Phase-contrast microscopy has traditionally come in two forms: simple, low cost, and qualitative; or elaborate, expensive, and quantitative. Now, scientists at the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST; Thuwal, Saudi Arabia) have come up with a white-light wavefront-sensing technique that leads to a simple but quantitative form of phase microscopy.

The method, which can be added to a standard commercial microscope with only small modifications, is an improvement on a speckle-tracking technique that the researchers previously developed, and uses a nonlinear model based on a generalization of the so-called transport of intensity equation (TIE), for which intensity images are taken at multiple defocused planes and the phase shifts numerically reconstructed. The microscope modifications consist of replacing the instrument’s camera with a high-resolution coded wavefront sensor consisting of a random phase mask placed 1.5 mm away from an intensity sensor, and modifying the microscope’s transillumination module for collimated but temporally incoherent light (white light). Because the illumination is collimated, the reference image is a diffraction pattern of the random phase maskintroducing a phase object distorts the wavefront in a way that is measurable by tracking movements in the speckle pattern introduced by the object. The technique allows simultaneous quantitative intensity and phase reconstruction. Reference: C. Wang et al., Sci. Rep. (2019); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50264-3.

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Precision Motion Control for Photonics: 5 Keys to Success

Aug. 30, 2024
Precision motion control is a key element in the development and production of silicon-photonic devices. Yet, when nanometers matter, it can be challenging to evaluate and implement...

Precision Motion Control for Sample Manipulation in Ultra-High Resolution Tomography

Aug. 30, 2024
Learn the critical items that designers and engineers must consider when attempting to achieve reliable ultra-high resolution tomography results here!

Motion Control Technologies for Medical Device Joining Applications

Aug. 30, 2024
Automated laser welding is beneficial in medical device manufacturing due to its precision, cleanliness, and efficiency. When properly optimized, it allows OEMs to achieve extremely...

How to Maximize Machine Building Performance with High-Performance Laser Processing

Aug. 30, 2024
Learn how an automotive high-speed laser blanking machine manufacturer builds machines that maximize throughput for faster processing speeds and improved productivity.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!