Laser-induced damage threshold is measured for CMOS, CCD, and digital-micromirror devices

July 1, 2018
Researchers have characterized the laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT) for CMOS and CCD cameras, as well as digital micromirror devices.

Laser-induced damage affects not only optics, but other optical-system components, too. Researchers at the Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies, and Image Exploitation (Ettlingen, Germany) have characterized the laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT) for CMOS and CCD cameras, as well as digital micromirror devices—all which can sit at a focal plane (intermediate or final) and thus be subjected to focused laser beams. The tests included the use of both pulsed and continuous-wave (CW) lasers.

The pulsed laser light used was the second harmonic (532 nm) of a Nd:YAG laser emitting at 1064 nm with 10 ns pulse duration and 300 mJ pulse energy at a 10 Hz repetition rate—the 1/e2 beam diameter was 6 mm. The CW laser was a 532-nm-emitting frequency-doubled diode-pumped solid-state (DPSS) laser with a 1/e2 beam size of 1.5 mm. A set of neutral-density filters was used to adjust the beam power, and the beams were focused to spot sizes of 28.2 μm for the pulsed laser source and 25.7 μm for the CW laser source. Test samples included color and monochrome CCDs, color and monochrome CMOS cameras, and a Texas Instruments DMD. Results showed that damage to CMOS devices tended to be star-shaped, while damage to CCDs were sometimes elongated in the vertical direction. CMOS cameras tended to be more damage-resistant than CCD devices. For CW light, damage thresholds tended to be in the tens of kW/cm2 region, although each device was different. For pulsed light, slight damage began in the 0.1 J/cm2 region for CCDs and CMOS devices—a more serious type of damage had its own threshold around 100 J/cm2. Overall, the DMD and the color CCD camera were most susceptible to laser damage. The researchers next want to run these tests using other pulse durations. Reference: B. Schwarz et al., Opt. Eng. (2017); doi:10.1117/1.oe.56.3.034108.

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Optical Filter Orientation Guide

Sept. 5, 2024
Ensure optimal performance of your optical filters with our Orientation Guide. Learn the correct placement and handling techniques to maximize light transmission and filter efficiency...

Advanced Spectral Accuracy: Excitation Filters

Sept. 5, 2024
Enhance your fluorescence experiments with our Excitation Filters. These filters offer superior transmission and spectral accuracy, making them ideal for exciting specific fluorophores...

Raman Filter Sets for Accurate Spectral Data

Sept. 5, 2024
Enhance your Raman spectroscopy with our specialized Raman Filter Sets. Designed for high precision, these filters enable clear separation of Raman signals from laser excitation...

Precision-Engineered Longpass Filters

Sept. 5, 2024
Discover our precision-engineered Longpass Filters, designed for high transmission and optimal wavelength separation. Perfect for fluorescence imaging, microscopy, and more.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!