Random-lasing-based Raman fiber amplification is temperature-insensitive

April 3, 2013
A team of researchers has experimentally compared two forms of distributed Raman amplification (DRA) for fibers: one relying on random fiber lasers (RFLs) either forward- or backward-pumped, and the other based on the more-conventional bidirectional first- or second-order pumping.

Researchers at the University of Electronic Science & Technology of China and Sichuan Normal University (both in Chengdu, China) have experimentally compared two forms of distributed Raman amplification (DRA) for fibers: one relying on random fiber lasers (RFLs) either forward- or backward-pumped, and the other based on the more-conventional bidirectional first- or second-order pumping. All experiments were carried out on 93 km of standard singlemode fiber, with the effective noise figure (ENF) being the parameter of interest.

Bidirectional first-order pumping was done with a 1480 nm pump, while second-order pumping used a 1366 nm pump and two 1454 nm fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) added to the fiber. The forward (or backward) random laser pumping was similar to the bidirectional second-order pumping, but with the removal of one FBG (or, for backward, the other FBG) to avoid facet feedback while lowering the lasing threshold. Random lasing occurs entirely through random Rayleigh distributed feedback and Raman amplification (no end mirrors are involved). Forward random pumping produced an ENF lower than that of the bidirectional first-order pumping and second-order pumping by 2.3 and 1.3 dB, respectively. Compared to bidirectional pumping, forward and backward random pumping had higher and lower gain, respectively. And, unlike bidirectional pumping, the random-lasing-based amplification was insensitive to variations in ambient temperature between -40 and +40°C. Contact Yun-Jiang Rao at [email protected].

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Hexapod 6-DOF Active Optical Alignment Micro-Robots - Enablers for Advanced Camera Manufacturing

Dec. 18, 2024
Optics and camera manufacturing benefits from the flexibility of 6-Axis hexapod active optical alignment robots and advanced motion control software

Laser Assisted Wafer Slicing with 3DOF Motion Stages

Dec. 18, 2024
Granite-based high-performance 3-DOF air bearing nanopositioning stages provide ultra-high accuracy and reliability in semiconductor & laser processing applications.

Steering Light: What is the Difference Between 2-Axis Galvo Scanners and Single Mirror 2-Axis Scanners

Dec. 18, 2024
Advantages and limitations of different 2-axis light steering methods: Piezo steering mirrors, voice-coil mirrors, galvos, gimbal mounts, and kinematic mounts.

Free Space Optical Communication

Dec. 18, 2024
Fast Steering Mirrors (FSM) provide fine steering precision to support the Future of Laser Based Communication with LEO Satellites

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!