SPECTROSCOPY: Two-dimensional IR method tracks proteomic fingerprints

Nov. 1, 2008
Biological scientists have often referred to proteomics, or the study of the proteome (a word coined in 1994 from protein and genome), as the next step after the gene sequencing of the Human Genome Project.

Biological scientists have often referred to proteomics, or the study of the proteome (a word coined in 1994 from protein and genome), as the next step after the gene sequencing of the Human Genome Project. For David Klug, who chairs the Single Cell Proteomics project at Imperial College (London, England), taking that step has at times seemed more akin to “gradually sliding down the slippery slope of asking more and more involved questions while becoming increasingly dissatisfied with the available tool set.”

Proteomics presents more-complex measurement problems for investigators than genomics, because genomes remain by and large constant, while proteomes (which consist of the entire complement of proteins expressed by a genome, cell, tissue, or organism) differ from cell to cell and moment to moment, as part and parcel of normal physiological function. So while numerous methods exist for cataloguing biological entities and characterizing biological functions, one reaches a point, even in biological systems less complex than the proteome, Klug said, where measurement results “only make sense when interpreted in the full biological context.”

Klug and his colleagues at Imperial College are addressing both the lack of biological context and the slippery slope of inadequate tools by adding innovative adaptations of optical methods, such as spectroscopy, to the proteome researcher’s tool set. Currently, the most widespread method for high-throughput protein identification combines the resolving power of electrophoresis with the fingerprinting capabilities of mass spectrometry. Nuclear-magnetic-resonance (NMR) methods can also provide information on the structure and conformation of proteins.

Four-wave mixing

Klug and colleagues are adding a high-resolution optical fingerprinting method, two-dimensional (2D) IR four-wave mixing, that is broadly analogous to 2D-NMR, “but many orders of magnitude more sensitive,” Klug said. “Instead of measuring spin-spin coupling, we’re measuring vibration-vibration coupling.” This spectroscopic identification of proteins is based on unique vibrational “fingerprints” left by the side chains of each amino acid.

The experimental setup consisted of two IR optical parametric amplifiers to provide two frequency-scannable IR beams and a picosecond regenerative amplifier to provide a visible beam at 800 nm. The three beams were overlapped on the sample to produce the visible four-wave-mixing signal, which was detected using a photomultiplier (see figure). The detected signal was plotted as a function of both IR frequencies to produce 2D spectra.

Based on results achieved so far, Klug estimates that 2D-IR spectroscopic identification of between six and nine amino acids will enable unambiguous identification of 90% of human proteins. He also estimates that identification times for each protein will eventually fall between ten seconds and two minutes.1-4

The 2D-IR electron-vibration-vibration technique may ultimately provide a relatively simple yet absolute quantification of protein levels, an increasingly important issue in many proteomic applications that is relatively difficult to achieve with mass spectrometry. But what the team has achieved so far is merely a proof of principle, Klug emphasized, and a lot of work remains to be done.

“The potential of the technique, at least in principle, is very high, but you have to imagine that this is just a short time after 2D-NMR’s invention and the technology is very clunky,” he said. “It’s going to take us a while to learn what we can really do with it. In actuality, we are investigating a whole class of potential techniques.”

REFERENCES

  1. F. Fourier, E.M. Gardner et al., PNAS, in press.
  2. P.M. Donaldson, R. Guo et al., Chemical Phys. 350, 201 (2008).
  3. F. Fournier, E.M. Gardner et al., Analytical Biochem. 374, 358 (2008).
  4. P.M. Donaldson, R. Guo, et al., J. Chem. Phys. 127, 114513 (2007).
  5. www.ch.ic.ac.uk/klug/Research/2DIR/OpticalSetup/OptSetup.html
About the Author

Hassaun A. Jones-Bey | Senior Editor and Freelance Writer

Hassaun A. Jones-Bey was a senior editor and then freelance writer for Laser Focus World.

Sponsored Recommendations

Precision Motion Control for Photonics: 5 Keys to Success

Aug. 30, 2024
Precision motion control is a key element in the development and production of silicon-photonic devices. Yet, when nanometers matter, it can be challenging to evaluate and implement...

Precision Motion Control for Sample Manipulation in Ultra-High Resolution Tomography

Aug. 30, 2024
Learn the critical items that designers and engineers must consider when attempting to achieve reliable ultra-high resolution tomography results here!

Motion Control Technologies for Medical Device Joining Applications

Aug. 30, 2024
Automated laser welding is beneficial in medical device manufacturing due to its precision, cleanliness, and efficiency. When properly optimized, it allows OEMs to achieve extremely...

How to Maximize Machine Building Performance with High-Performance Laser Processing

Aug. 30, 2024
Learn how an automotive high-speed laser blanking machine manufacturer builds machines that maximize throughput for faster processing speeds and improved productivity.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!