Two ultrafast beams with 29.8 fs pulses are coherently combined

Feb. 17, 2016
Coherent combination of beams from separate lasers can potentially achieve higher beam powers than any other technical approach.
Content Dam Lfw Print Articles 2016 02 1602lfw Nb F1

Coherent combination of beams from separate lasers is an important and ongoing topic, as it can potentially achieve higher beam powers than any other technical approach. What may be surprising to some is that coherent combination of ultrafast laser beams is being pursued as well. Particularly interesting is a parallel configuration for ultrafast beam combining. In this case, an example system consists of an ultrafast oscillator whose beam is split into multiple beams, with each beam then sent through an ultrafast amplifier. The hard part comes last, when multiple ultrafast pulses must be precisely aligned in relative phase so that they can be combined into one very high energy pulse.

Researchers at the China Academy of Engineering Physics and the Science and Technology on Plasma Physics Laboratory (both in Mianyang), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Shanghai), and Xi'an Jiaotong University (Xi'an) have developed and experimentally demonstrated a method for coherently combining ultrafast laser pulses. The method, which in its prototype form combines two pulses, relies on controlling phase (relative synchronization error), piston, and tilt of the two pulses at two locations: first, at a point where the two pulses are overlaid noncollinearly (at an angle with respect to each other) and second in the far field. In the first region, a noncollinear cross-correlation allows the temporal characteristics of the pulses to be mapped to a spatial distribution of the cross-correlation signal, making the synchronization error clear. The researchers built a two-beam setup in which pulses seeded by a mode-locked oscillator were amplified to a 1 mJ pulse energy with a 29.8 fs duration and a 1 kHz repetition rate. The two beams were combined coherently with an efficiency of 99%. Reference: J. Mu et al., Opt. Lett. (Dec. 3, 2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ol.41.000234.

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Hexapod 6-DOF Active Optical Alignment Micro-Robots - Enablers for Advanced Camera Manufacturing

Dec. 18, 2024
Optics and camera manufacturing benefits from the flexibility of 6-Axis hexapod active optical alignment robots and advanced motion control software

Laser Assisted Wafer Slicing with 3DOF Motion Stages

Dec. 18, 2024
Granite-based high-performance 3-DOF air bearing nanopositioning stages provide ultra-high accuracy and reliability in semiconductor & laser processing applications.

Steering Light: What is the Difference Between 2-Axis Galvo Scanners and Single Mirror 2-Axis Scanners

Dec. 18, 2024
Advantages and limitations of different 2-axis light steering methods: Piezo steering mirrors, voice-coil mirrors, galvos, gimbal mounts, and kinematic mounts.

Free Space Optical Communication

Dec. 18, 2024
Fast Steering Mirrors (FSM) provide fine steering precision to support the Future of Laser Based Communication with LEO Satellites

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!