Study of optically clear epoxies under ionizing radiation results in one best choice

Aug. 11, 2020
Scientists at Fermilab studied optically clear cements for use in scintillator optics; tests under ionizing radiation from their accelerator produced a clear winner.

One of the more underrepresented materials in discussions of optics is optical cementperhaps because it’s just been doing its job for decades. But it is an optical material in the light path that can have its own effects. In one special case of this, researchers from Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Batavia, IL) have done a study on the effect of ionizing radiation on some commercially available optically clear epoxies. It should be noted that the Fermi scientists’ interests in optics relate to plastic scintillation detectors, and thus the “optically clear” cements they chose for their study are somewhat different from those usually used for precision optics. They chose plastic-scintillator cements made by Saint-Gobain (Courbevoie, France) and Eljen Technologies (Sweetwater, TX) along with some more general-purpose clear epoxies from System Three (Lacey, WA) and other epoxy manufacturers.

The epoxies were all tested for compatibility with a standard poly(vinyltoluene) scintillator, assembling the scintillators, waiting a year, and then seeing if there were any changes to the scintillator at the epoxy interface: all epoxies passed this test easily. Next, epoxy samples were prepared in two batches separated by one year, with the samples run in a centrifuge before they cured to remove bubbles (samples were 7 mm thick, which is much thicker than the typical 0.1 mm joint thickness). Transmittance over the 1901100 nm wavelength range was measured before and after exposure to a mixed radiation field at Fermilab’s accelerator. Extrapolating from the 7 mm thickness, measurements showed at least a 5% loss for a 0.1 mm thickness, although two cements did quite a bit better, especially at 400 nm, than the rest. One was difficult to work with, as its silicone-like rubberiness prevented polishing, but the other, made by System Three, was pronounced a good potential candidate for bonding scintillators to light guides or photosensors. Reference: R. J. Tesarek et al., arXiv:2007.02996v1 (July 6, 2020).

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Advancing Neuroscience Using High-Precision 3D Printing

March 7, 2025
Learn how Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Used High-Precision 3D Printing to Advance Neuroscience Research using 3D Printed Optical Drives.

From Prototyping to Production: How High-Precision 3D Printing is Reinventing Electronics Manufacturing

March 7, 2025
Learn how micro 3D printing is enabling miniaturization. As products get smaller the challenge to manufacture small parts increases.

Sputtered Thin-film Coatings

Feb. 27, 2025
Optical thin-film coatings can be deposited by a variety of methods. Learn about 2 traditional methods and a deposition process called sputtering.

What are Notch Filters?

Feb. 27, 2025
Notch filters are ideal for applications that require nearly complete rejection of a laser line while passing as much non-laser light as possible.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!