Heated prisms deflect beam with no moving parts

May 21, 2001
Useful for optical switching and other applications, beam deflectors of nonmechanical design can be simpler and more reliable than their counterparts that rely on mechanical motions. Researchers at Radiant Research Inc. and The University of Texas at Austin (both in Austin, Texas) have developed an alternative that relies on the thermo-optic effect, in which a temperature change alters the refractive index.

Useful for optical switching and other applications, beam deflectors of nonmechanical design can be simpler and more reliable than their counterparts that rely on mechanical motions. For example, electro-optic deflectors operate with no moving parts; however, they must be driven at voltages of at least 1000 V. Researchers at Radiant Research Inc. and The University of Texas at Austin (both in Austin, Texas) have developed an alternative that relies on the thermo-optic effect, in which a temperature change alters the refractive index.

The switching structure is fabricated on silicon and consists of alternating thin-film microprisms of silica and polymer clad with silica underneath and polymer on top. The prisms are 600-µm equilateral triangles with a thickness of 5 µm. The whole is temperature-controlled by a heating electrode. The silica is doped to have the same refractive index as the polymer at 20°C. The silica has a thermo-optic coefficient of +1 × 10-5/°C, while the corresponding figure for the polymer is -1.4 × 10-4/°C; the resulting effect for the design geometry is a temperature-dependent beam deflection of 0.06°/°C. Stable to 250°C, the polymer has an optical loss of 0.2 dB/cm at 633 nm and 0.3 dB/cm at 1550 nm (silica has virtually zero loss at these scales).

Tested using 633-nm light launched into the waveguide by a spherical and a cylindrical lens, the device achieved a maximum beam deflection of 3.7° when subjected to a temperature change of 60°C. Theory predicts six resolvable spots for such a device; the actual three resolvable spots were likely due to a Gaussian beam waist too small by a factor of two. Predicted power consumption of the heating element is 10 mW. For more information, contact Suning Tang at [email protected].

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Melles Griot Optical Systems and Semrock Optical Filters for Spatial Biology

Feb. 26, 2025
Discover why a robust, high-throughput fluorescence imaging system with Semrock optical filters is key for Spatial Biology.

Working with Optical Density

Feb. 26, 2025
Optical Density, or OD, is a convenient tool used to describe the transmission of light through a highly blocking optical filter.

Finding the Right Dichroic Beamsplitter

Feb. 26, 2025
Unsure how to select the right dichroic beamsplitter? Explore our selection guide for our wide variety of 45º dichroic beamsplitters.

Measurement of Optical Filter Spectra

Feb. 26, 2025
Learn about the limitations of standard metrology techniques and how Semrock utilizes different measurement approaches to evaluate filter spectra.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!